This document is email correspondence describing the content of a mission report and requesting clarification on its content. All descriptive and estima…
Full Document Text
Text extracted directly from the source PDF. Text extraction via abigailhaddad/ufo-releases; original file at war.gov.
Read the full text (1,344 characters)
--- PAGE 1 ---
(b) (6)
I just got off the phone with the unit that flies 1.4(a) They said to me
that the two lines listed are on the UNCLASSIFIED level and that adding in
the AOR as INDOPACOM is also at the UNCLASSIFIED level.
(b) (6)
PAROC Intel Data Analysis Technician
Team Lead
12 AF / DET 3
(b) (6)
(b) (6)
CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN
Hello,
Per our conversa on, can you please confirm that the 1.4(a) tearlines below
are at the UNCLASSIFIED level? Also, could you please confirm that we can
use the AOR INDOPACOM.
Thank you,
(b) (6)
1
--- PAGE 2 ---
(b) (6)
CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN
(b) (6)
CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN
Hello,
I wanted to clarify that these tearlines are approved at the UNCLASSIFIED
level.
1.4(a) on 10APR25
//UNCLASSIFIED//
US AIRCRAFT OBSERVED 1X POSS UAP FOR 12 SECONDS AT 2353Z, FLYING AT UNK
ALTITUDE AND UNK SPEED, NO INTERFERENCE WAS NOTED.
//UNCLASSIFIED//
1.4(a) on 11APR25
//UNCLASSIFIED//
US AIRCRAFT OBSERVED 1X POSS UAP FOR 23 SECONDS AT 0007Z, FLYING AT UNK
ALTITUDE AND UNK SPEED, NO INTERFERENCE WAS NOTED.
//UNCLASSIFIED//
Thank you,
(b) (6)
Informa on Disclosure Analyst
Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security
(b) (6)
2 View the official fileCongressional Context
No confirmed links between this file and the congressional record yet. Connections are added only when the source text supports them, never inferred.